Canon Digital Rebel T1i 500d
canon digital rebel t1i 500d Camera 500D - Canon Eos 500D Rebel T1I Since the early days of digital photography, I use mainly include electronic devices. Although the picture quality in the initi...
canon digital rebel t1i 500d
Camera 500D - Canon Eos 500D Rebel T1ISince the early days of digital photography, I use mainly include electronic devices. Although the picture quality in the initial period as compared to analog photography was pretty gruesome, so the direct availability, direct editing weighed, the direct print mE In most cases, the disadvantages of the lack of quality. For the cases of truly challenging photography I took my two analog SLR to date: a Rolleiflex and a Minolta. The Canon EOS 500D is my first digital SLR. A gift of the family on the recommendation of a photo retailer. The initial experience. Focus and speed: Automatic, fast, accurate in all available modes. In any case, this is true with the supplied kit lens 18-55mm IS. In focus-tracking is still accurate, and also for movement-images quickly enough. Manual focus of course, also works. But why? Exposure and focus can be set to spot or evaluative. This is sufficient for practice. Handling: This material is OK. The camera seems robust and stable. Only in comparison with the magnesium-Teddy from Nikon, Canon, Pentax, Olympus is seen and felt it better. The camera is great for my hands not the optimum, but it can still work well with it. The "low" weight has advantages and disadvantages. The balance is thus more in the direction of the lens, you have to carry less. Stabilization by hand is not sufficient given. Anyone who comes from a compact camera, and has never worked with an SLR, will find the camera but as a very high quality and very large. All buttons and controls open up after a short acclimation. The monitor is of excellent quality. However, the monitor I use only for movies and for settings. In the pure photography mode, I shut it off permanently, because I'm used to at first, use the viewfinder of an SLR, and second is the Live View focusing a slow wit. What exactly is this live-view? In my view, a pure marketing gimmick for people who come from digital compact cameras. The viewfinder is much faster and the first images the way you want them and how you see them. I use the movie mode in the 720p version. Give me perfect, and the results are reproduced at 30 frames per second, also in a liquid. Unlike others, I find the video function is very nice and helpful. Here you MUST use the Monitor Incidentally, since, because the mirror pops up, the viewfinder remains black. For the main point: How are the pictures? I can only write something about the standard system, ie, body image stabilization with the kit lens 18-55mm. Quite amazing in my eyes the noise performance, image stabilization and the detailing of the camera in poor, low-light conditions. I've shot in street lighting, clear photos of moving objects are not from the hand to ISO 1600. Super. Here the noise behavior of the camera is really very good. Both RAW as well as in JPEG Fine. Indoors, I leave the flash off and the images are generally 1A. Enables you to pinpoint the flash of a face against a light background, for example, add, control the camera performs a really great job: The images are not "flash is dead" but really brightened only by the relevant authorities. The rest, of course, remains. The level of detail is extremely high, though many details are available, which differ in color. BUT: In contrast to low light conditions, the texture behavior in the sunshine in JPEG mode is improved. Regardless of whether program, aperture or aperture priority and even in purely manual recording level> the texture behavior, and also the highlight of treatment are not optimal. Texture says: The surface treatment. Here for example is from my white shepherd dog in the snow in sunlight, sometimes even a white mass with two button issues, and I quite a lot of aperture, time, white balance, etc. I experimented. DAS may also have a good compact better. This could be, as is the dynamic behavior at high dynamic range of the recording in JPEG mode, with a firmware adjustment mE be improved. All in all, the Camera 500D, but a very good, fast camera with excellent picture quality in almost any lighting condition, which dedicated amateur photographers offers everything they need when they do not want to shoot in the rain or the Sahara. The image quality in RAW mode is probably just as well as in the two-digit and APS-C models from Nikon and Canon. I do not know yet whether I'll keep it. If I had picked myself a DSLR and would not get this as a gift, it would probably become a Pentax K-7th Why? I once had with a Rolleiflex in the Sahara. After the repair and cleaning was almost as expensive as the camera itself. A water-and dust-tight enclosure is m.E. worth a lot and for a reasonable price, offers, in conjunction with a magnesium body and video recording, only the Pentax. > How Will see. For, from this level of photography, the EOS 500D back in the digital compact class level now also even () anymore. About the Author You Can See My Lens at www.squidoo.com/Camera500D For more great tips and necessary information on similar topics by the author, read his guides on EOS500D.ueuo.com |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Which Canon Digital Rebel is Best - XSi, T1i, Or X1i?
What you must do is settle within yourself what your priorities are in buying a new Digital Rebel.
Oh, I almost forgot to tell you. But you probably already know. There is no Rebel X1i... yet.
I have no idea how these camera makers come up with their camera names, but it is certainly confusing, isn't it?
There is a long line of Digital Rebels, beginning with the original Digital Rebel 300D. At that time, there were no 3 character combinations to remember like XSi, XT1, or JQ2. These letters are hard to keep in mind if you don't already own one of the cameras they represent. One thing that has remained constant is the number system that Canon uses. It started with the Rebel 300D and each new entry has added 50. So there was the Digital Rebel 350D, 400D, and now we are up to the 500D which is the T1i.
So this article is really about whether you should buy a Digital Rebel 450D or 500D.
Historically, Canon has added to the Rebel line of cameras about every 2 years.
Each new entry has had some very significant upgrades from the previous model.
That is, until you get to the most recent offering, which hit the market only about a year after the previous version.
The result is, in many experts' opinions, that the upgrades in the Rebel T1i are not enough to warrant an individual to buy the newest model.
Now, there are a couple of very valid reasons to buy the newer version of the Rebel:
- You are buying your first DSLR, and you simply want the newest model you can get.
- You want a DSLR that has video capture.
- Money is no object for you, and you just want a decent backup camera.
I have checked with some very reliable sources to come to the conclusion that the previous version of Digital Rebel (the XSi) is a very reliable, well featured digital camera that takes photos that are considered among the best at this level and price range.
There are a few differences that I will note:
- 12.2 megapixels vs 15.1 megapixels (not significant at all considering the ability to print super large pictures from either)
- DIGIC 4 processor vs DIGIC III processor (while the DIGIC 4 is better, unless you are a pixel prude, you will not be able to tell the difference)
- 3" LCD with a resolution of about 930,000 pixels vs 3: LCD with a resolution of about 230,000 pixels (while this seems significant, what you see on the LCD panel should not drive your decision to purchase)
- Creative Auto is available only on the newer model (this is a way to alter the output of your camera by added "photo filters" - some reviews have stated that the output is not consistent... I prefer to make these changes in photoshop or some other processing software)
- Video Capture is available only on the newer model (while this may be a deciding factor for you, reviews have had mixed feelings about the video capabilities, especially the lack of a good sound recorder)
OK, that sounds like I am totally against the Digital Rebel T1i.
But it ain't so.
I think that both cameras would be a fantastic fit for anyone except the extreme amateur or the professional photographer.
Digital Rebels have always given their owners fantastic images. Mine certainly did. And these two cameras are no different. Both are HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.
Hopefully you are better informed now than you were. Buying a new camera has always been an exciting venture for me. There are so many techy options and features that the pro reviewers look at. But in my opinion, it all boils down to this - will the camera do what you want it to do.
About the Author
In this case, either the Rebel XSi or T1i will. There is more info at www.digital-photographic-resources.com, including product pictures and features.
I am also an amateur photographer. You can see some examples of my photography at http://www.thewayeyeseeit.net. Many of the pictures displayed are taken with a Rebel.